Waking up in America, Olympic events are just wrapping up. Some events happen just as most Americans are getting up, but the majority are taking place while we sleep. To help keep us in the loop, NBC and its affiliates have been compiling the best of the competitions to be put on the air during the domestic primetime spot. This allows fans to get in on the action and catch up on what they may have missed.
This would be great if it weren’t for one problem: anyone
who actually cares about the games already knows what happened. ESPN is well
ahead on that issue, sending alerts and updates on most major Olympic events as
they happen. Before I even have time to turn on the TV, I’ve already been
updated on the night’s festivities.
The 24-hour news cycle that has become the standard no
longer allows for the notion of “primetime television,” at least not in terms
of rebroadcasting. If something is happening, the public wants to know about it
as soon as it happens, not on a delay or after it has been compiled in a neat
presentation afterward. What could be a neater package than 140 characters?
If you’ve ever watched a sporting event with real
significance, though, you don’t need to be told what 140 characters fail to get
across. You don’t get the pit in your stomach from the anxiety of seeing your
team or favorite athlete put themselves on the line. You don’t feel the rush of
joy when that athlete or team pulls away with the win. You don’t feel the
confusion of a loss, and the disappointment that ensues. We might want to know
what happened, but we live to see how it happened.
With that in mind, we’re pretty much stuck. How do we feel
all of the excitement that comes with the Olympics, yet also get all the
information as its happening on the other side of the globe?
There isn’t really a good answer. Nobody faults ESPN and the
sporting world for getting us the news quickly. Quite the opposite. We would be
upset if they didn’t. Yet NBC is also doing the best they can to get us the
full package of the Olympic experience, and do it in the context of American
life.
The reality is that the way different countries interact
with the Olympics will have to change not only based on the location but also
in conjunction with the technologies available. The days of watching suspenseful
events on an American timeframe are over, leaving a few options.
One is, of course, to stay up late into the night or wake up
ridiculously early to catch things as they happen. Nocturnal behavior isn’t
usually recommended, but I’m sure your friends and colleagues would understand
if you explained that you simply couldn’t miss the curling champions of the
world (ok, maybe they’d judge you a little)
Short of that, though, some form of adaptation is going to
have to happen, either by the consumer or by the producer. This year is one of
the first where technologies are as easily accessible as they ever have been.
Twitter and Facebook were hardly around in 2010, let alone as widely used as
they are now. Maybe the change will come in the form of a new technology. Maybe
we will find new ways of broadcasting to meet the changed expectations. Maybe
the notion of “primetime” will change to reflect the new “news cycle.” This is
still a young system, and one that has some work to do in working out the
kinks. But, when all is said and done, the Olympics will hold our attention,
and ESPN and NBC will find ways to keep it that way.
No comments:
Post a Comment